Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Advanced Search

Search for

Print Page Follow BioNews on Twitter BioNews RSS feed

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook

King's College London - Health: More than a medical matter

Woman in Canada begins lawsuit to find out her genetic identity

10 November 2008

By Sarah Guy

Appeared in BioNews 483

A 26 year old woman in Canada conceived using donor sperm has begun legal action to attempt to make available the identities of anonymous sperm donors, including that of her own father. Olivia Pratten is acting on behalf of all those in British Columbia (BC) conceived using donor sperm or egg, who share her 'psychological distress' at not knowing her origins.

The lawsuit, against BC's attorney general and the province's College of Physicians and Surgeons, is based on the guarantee of 'equality and security of the person' included in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Pratten claims that the law governing information disclosure in the case of donor-conceived children is discriminatory, unlike that for adopted children who have certain legal rights to information about their biological parents. At present, records relating to donor-conceived children can be destroyed by a doctor six years after treatment.

'The child is the one who lives with the choices that were made for them before they were born and who bears the consequences of these adult decisions', Pratten commented. When she was five, her parents received only the most basic information about her biological father when they wrote to their fertility specialist. In 2001, Pratten met the doctor herself to request more detail, but was told nothing more beyond the fact that a 'verbal medical check had been done'. Others involved in the case have similarly tried to get access to vital health information about biological parents and been told that the relevant files are destroyed.

The lawsuit was a last resort for Pratten who has described her search for information as a 'complete legislative void', and the lack of regulation and accountability 'unethical and unacceptable'. Four days after the suit was filed, the BC Supreme Court issued an injunction preventing the destruction of any records of gamete donation pending a further hearing where Ms Pratten will seek a more permanent solution.

Some commentators have held that we have an obligation not to create 'genetic orphans' deliberately, stating that this creates a 'loss of identity'. Margaret Somerville, ethicist at the McGill Centre for Medicine, Ethics and Law believes that human rights specific to babies must be outlined. 'One of those human rights is to know your genetic origins', Somerville said.

Fertility doctors in Canada do worry that if donor anonymity were removed, donation rates would drop, as indeed they did in the UK when donor anonymity was removed in 2005. Waiting lists for donated gametes can be up to 2 years with some clinics suggesting patients consider buying sperm from overseas.


The Canadian Press | 28 October 2008
Do you know who my daddy is?
The Globe and Mail | 31 October 2008
Arvay Finlay Barristers press release | 28 October 2008
Suit seeks identities of sperm, egg donors
The National Post | 30 October 2008 | 02 November 2008


11 July 2011 - by Professor Eric Blyth 
It is not so long since I applauded the decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia (BC) for promoting the disclosure of the identity of gamete and embryo donors to their offspring [1]. News that the BC Attorney-General is appealing the judgment to the federal Supreme Court indicates that my enthusiasm was a case of premature elation [2]. The good news for those of us who believe that non-anonymous donation is the only ethical form of gamete and embryo donation is that if the federal Su... [Read More]
11 July 2011 - by Vince Londini 
In December, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) struck down most of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act (AHRA) of 2004. This ruling invalidated almost all Canadian federal regulations covering the many sticky areas of emerging Assisted Human Reproduction (AHR) practice... [Read More]
27 June 2011 - by Professor Naomi Cahn and Wendy Kramer 
The fertility industry in the US state of Washington will be transformed in late July 2011, when a new law to recognise rights of donor-conceived people comes into effect. Under the changes, anyone who provides gametes to a fertility clinic in the state must also provide identifying information about themselves and their medical history... [Read More]
06 June 2011 - by Professor Eric Blyth and Dr Marilyn Crawshaw 
The regulation of assisted human reproduction in Canada has had a long and tortuous history. Twenty one years after a Royal Commission appointed by the federal government recommended legislation (1), and following several failed attempts to get legislation through the Canadian parliament, the Assisted Human Reproduction Act 2004 came into force (2)... [Read More]
23 May 2011 - by Sarah Guy 
Anonymous egg and sperm donation will no longer be permitted in British Columbia (BC), Canada, after a donor-conceived woman, Olivia Pratten, took the provincial government to court to argue that its adoption laws discriminated against individuals such as herself.... [Read More]

Be the first to have your say.

You need to Login or Register to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions



- click here to enquire about using this story.

Printer Friendly Page

Published by the Progress Educational Trust
FREE public event in central London, 6.30pm on Thursday 8 May 2014 - find out more HERE

Please donate HERE, so that the Progress Educational Trust can continue throughout 2014 (and beyond) while keeping BioNews FREE for you to read

The Progress Educational Trust was shortlisted for the Charity Times Awards 2011

Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE, and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation