Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


The Fertility Show


 

US congress approves genetic anti-discrimination law

06 May 2008

By MacKenna Roberts

Appeared in BioNews 456

Following the Senate's unanimous approval the previous week, the US House of Representatives, on Thursday, almost-unanimously (414-1) passed the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ('GINA'), providing final Congressional support for legislation that prohibits genetic discrimination by employers, insurers and unions. The bill (HR 493), which is hailed as the first major civil rights legislation of the 21st century, now proceeds onto President Bush who has promised to sign the act into law.

GINA prevents insurers and employers from requesting or requiring predictive genetic testing. Employers will not be able to hire, fire, promote or compensate an employee on the basis of a genetic test revealing a biologically increased risk of disease, suspected to hinder future work productivity or require costly benefit provision. Violations could cost employers steep fines up to £150,000 per breach. Health insurers also will not be able to determine coverage eligibility, premium rates or increases based upon genetic tests indicating susceptibility to disease and may only continue to consider existing/expressed diseases. The landmark protections do not extend to the US military and only apply to health insurance, silently omitting any other type, including life or long-term care insurance. Once signed by Bush, the insurance measures will take effect in one year and the employment measures become effective after 18 months.

The overwhelming support for the bill belies its thirteen-year struggle for passage. Health insurance, employer and business interest groups pressured representatives to bury previous versions in committee before reaching a floor-vote. This time conservative Senators achieved 'concessions' to protect business-interests, including employers avoiding liability for genetic discrimination involving the employer's health plan. However, the US Chamber of Commerce, which represents 3 million businesses, still opposes the current amended bill. Texan House Republican Ron Paul, who opposes federal government's intrusive role to protect privacy, was the only person to vote against the bill.

Doctors hope that GINA will abate popular fears that people's genetic information will be misused, thereby encouraging people to seek testing and participate in research trials. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) reported that 32 per cent of women declined breast cancer testing because they were scared they would lose their health insurance. An NIH study of families with a history of colon cancer found that 68 per cent said they would not pay through their insurer for fear of losing coverage and 26 per cent would give a false name. In a 2001 study by the American Management Association, nearly two-thirds of major US companies require new employee medical examinations. Fourteen per cent conduct tests for susceptibility to workplace hazards, three per cent for breast and colon cancer, and one per cent for sickle cell anemia. Twenty per cent require family medical history.

'We will never unlock the great promise of the Human Genome Project if Americans are too afraid to get genetic testing,' said GINA co-sponsor House Representative Judy Biggert. 'No one should fear for their job or health coverage because of the genes they were born with, and now they won't have to', she explained.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Congress passes anti-genetic discrimination bill
Associated Press | 02 May 2008
 
Reuters | 05/2008
 
San Francisco Chronicle | 02 May 2008
 
House Passes Genetic Nondiscrimination Bill; President Bush Expected To Sign
Medical News Today | 05 May 2008
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

08 June 2015 - by Chee Hoe Low 
A company that conducted genetic tests on its employees for a disciplinary investigation violated US genetic anti-discrimination law, an Atlanta judge has ruled...
06 December 2010 - by Sarah Pritchard 
A recent disclosure by WikiLeaks of tens of thousands of sensitive diplomatic cables includes instructions to US diplomats to collect biometric information on 'key civilian and military officials' including 'fingerprints, facial images, DNA, and iris scans'....
27 September 2010 - by Seil Collins 
The US National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has introduced new legislation requiring all incoming students at the highest level of intercollegiate athletics to be tested for sickle cell trait. The testing, which will affect approximately 170,000 incoming student-athletes, is being watched closely as a case study of modern large-scale genetic screening...
30 November 2009 - by Dr Jess Buxton 
After almost ten happy years as a BioNews editor, this issue will be my last. I started working for Progress Educational Trust (PET) in February 2000, nearly a year after BioNews was launched by Juliet Tizzard, the first PET director. In my first week, I remember thinking how useful a news digest of developments in the fast-moving areas of genetics and assisted reproduction was - and what a fascinating job it was going to be. But at the same time, I privately wondered whether there would be q...
02 June 2008 - by MacKenna Roberts 
Last Wednesday, President Bush signed into law the US's long-awaited Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ('GINA'), heralded as the first civil rights legislation of the new millennium. The legislation swept Congress with a combined almost-unanimous 509-1 vote and will prohibit genetic discrimination by employers, insurers and unions...

28 April 2008 - by MacKenna Roberts 
The US Senate has unanimously (95-0) approved legislation to prohibit genetic discrimination by employers, insurers and unions. Following thirteen years of effort, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act ('GINA') is finally expected early next week, to breeze through approval in the House of Representatives, which supported the...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Moving the Boundaries of Human Reproduction

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Jacques Cohen

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Andy Greenfield

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation