Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews


Printer Friendly Page Follow BioNews on Twitter BioNews RSS feed

 

Login




News


New US guidelines for Down syndrome screening

08 January 2007

By Dr Jess Buxton

Appeared in BioNews 390

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has recommended that all pregnant women should be offered screening for Down syndrome, regardless of their age. Lead author Dr Deborah Driscoll said last week that 'this new recommendation says that the maternal age of 35 should no longer be used by itself as a cut-off to determine who is offered screening versus who is offered invasive diagnostic testing'. The advice is published in a Practice Bulletin developed jointly by ACOG and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, in the January issue of the journal Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Currently, invasive tests such as amniocentesis or CVS (chorionic villus sampling) are only routinely offered to women older than 35, who are at the highest risk of having an affected child. The incidence of Down syndrome is about one in every 1,300 births in young women, rising to one in 350 births for mothers over 35, and one in 25 in those over 45. But since the introduction of screening tests for older women, most children with Down syndrome are now born to younger women, according to Dr Edward McCabe of the Mattel Children's Hospital at the University of California.

The original reason for focussing on women over 35 was that invasive tests carry a small risk of miscarriage - about one in every 200 procedures. According to Dr Nancy Green, medical director of the March of Dimes charity, this risk has declined over the last decade but many women prefer to avoid the test altogether unless they are at high risk of having an affected child. The new guidelines call for all pregnant women to be offered a combination of non-invasive tests during the first trimester. Such tests involve a combination of the 'nuchal translucency' ultrasound method, and a maternal blood test.

Women identified as being at high risk through these initial tests should then be offered either amniocentesis or CVS in the second trimester, say ACOG. Current UK guidelines, issued by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in 2003, already say that all pregnant women should be offered one of a number of proven, non-invasive methods of screening for Down syndrome. Women found to be at high risk of carrying a fetus with Down syndrome are then offered either amniocentesis or CVS.


Dr Jess Buxton is Contributing Editor at BioNews and a Trustee at the charity that publishes it, the Progress Educational Trust (PET). She is co-author of The Rough Guide to Genes and Cloning (buy this book from Amazon UK or Amazon USA) and Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Reproducing Regulation (buy this book from Amazon UK or Amazon USA).

 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

01 November 2009 - by Nienke Korsten 
According to figures published in the British Medical Journal last week, the number of diagnoses of Down syndrome in babies and fetuses in England and Wales has risen by 71 per cent over the past 20 years. This is attributed to an increase in maternal age over this period. A concurrent increase in terminations of affected pregnancies as a result of improved prenatal screening methods has meant that numbers of live births with Down syndrome have fallen by one per cent, whereas they would have ...[Read More]
08 September 2008 - by Dr Rebecca Robey 
Scientists have discovered the earliest genetic changes that occur in Down's syndrome, resulting in the abnormal development of the foetus and eventually leading to the host of medical complications associated with the disorder. The findings, published in the American Journal of Human Genetics, are a step forward...[Read More]

30 June 2005 - by BioNews 
New recommendations for prenatal screening programmes to detect Down syndrome could lead to some chromosome abnormalities being missed, UK researchers say. A team based at Salisbury District Hospital looked at the likely effect of the proposal to scrap a type of testing called karyotyping in favour of newer, rapid methods...[Read More]

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to Login or Register to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

 


 

- click here to enquire about using this story.


submit to reddit
Delicious delicious
Facebook

Share on Tumblr


Printer Friendly Page


BioNews Appeal: Please donate HERE to keep BioNews independent and FREE to read


The Progress Educational Trust has been shortlisted for the Charity Times Awards 2011

Good Fundraising Code


Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details