Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews


Printer Friendly Page Follow BioNews on Twitter BioNews RSS feed

 

Login




News


Embryology law reform contained in Queen's speech

20 November 2006

By Antony Blackburn-Starza

Appeared in BioNews 385

The UK Government is set to reform laws regulating human embryology and fertility treatment, and is expected to recommend allowing lesbian couples and single mothers equal access to IVF. The proposed reform was contained in the Queen's Speech, delivered last Wednesday: 'Draft proposals will be published to reform the regulation of human embryology'.

The current regulations, contained in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (HFE) Act 1990, stipulate in Section 25 that clinics providing IVF should take into account the welfare of the child, 'including a child's need for a father'. This has been interpreted in some cases to mean the exclusion of lesbian and single women from IVF.

The phrase, enclosed in brackets in the Act, has been heavily criticised for being outdated and some advisers to the Government have warned that it may be in breach of the Human Rights Act 1998. The proposed changes will probably rephrase the requirement or remove it from the Act all together. Dr Evan Harris, Liberal Democrat MP, has welcomed the news saying, 'the dropping of this discriminatory and unnecessary provision is long overdue'. However, Josephine Quintavalle, of Comment on Reproductive Ethics, has called it 'gender correctness at its most ridiculous', saying that it discriminates against men. Some commentators have raised concerns that allowing women to reproduce without a male partner may lead to men's roles in reproduction becoming redundant, but with IVF being a costly and uncomfortable procedure, used by a minority of couples, such a prophecy is unlikely to become reality.

The reform of embryology law also includes proposals for the replacement of the HFE Authority and the Human Tissue Authority (HTA) with one regulatory body, the Regulatory Authority for Tissue and Embryos (RATE). The British Medical Association raised concerns that one regulatory body may not be able to deal effectively with their specialist areas. Dr Tony Calland, Chairman of the British Medical Association (BMA)'s Medical Ethics Committee, issued a statement in response to the Queen's Speech. He said, 'There needs to be a proper debate on whether a new body needs to be established rather than how it should be set up'.

 

SOURCES & REFERENCES
The Mirror | 13 November 2006
 
The Daily Mail | 16 November 2006
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

17 July 2006 - by Dr Kirsty Horsey 
UK Health Minister Caroline Flint has told an evidence session of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (STC) that there is 'probably not a case' for maintaining the part of the law that says that clinics must take into account the potential child's 'need...[Read More]
16 August 2005 - by BioNews 
The UK's Department of Health (DH) is inviting views on the way that some assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are regulated in the UK. Its review forms part of a wider consultation on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (HFE) Act, passed in 1990, which some say has become out-of-date, 'outstripped' by...[Read More]

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to Login or Register to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

 


 

- click here to enquire about using this story.


submit to reddit
Delicious delicious
Facebook

Share on Tumblr


Printer Friendly Page


BioNews Appeal: Please donate HERE to keep BioNews independent and FREE to read


The Progress Educational Trust has been shortlisted for the Charity Times Awards 2011

Good Fundraising Code


Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details