Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews


Printer Friendly Page Follow BioNews on Twitter BioNews RSS feed

 

Login




News


Human Fertilisation Act under scrutiny

27 October 2003

By BioNews

Appeared in BioNews 231

The Science and Technology Committee of the UK House of Commons is to look at whether the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act of 1990 is still working effectively.

The committee announced that it will conduct an inquiry into the future of the 1990 Act, in the light of a number of recent court cases that have challenged either its provisions or the right of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) to regulate on a number of specific issues. For example, a judicial review of the HFEA's decision to license PGD (preimplantation genetic diagnosis ) with tissue typing was undertaken by a pro-life group after the authority gave the Hashmi family permission to use the technique. Initially, the UK's High Court ruled that the authority did not have the power to authorise the tissue typing procedure, but this ruling was later overruled by the Court of Appeal.

In 2001, another pro-life group challenged whether the law regulating the use of cloned embryos was as the Government assumed it to be, after it made amendments to the HFE Act in January of that year. In March 2003, the House of Lords finally confirmed, after two appeals, that the definition of embryo in the Act does extend to those created by cloning. More recently, the provisions in the Act relating to consent and the use of frozen stored human embryos has been the subject of a challenge by two women who wanted to use embryos they had created with former partners who had subsequently withdrawn their consent.

The Science and Technology Committee previously called for the HFE Act to be updated in its fourth report, 'Developments in Human Genetics and Embryology', published in July 2002. Since then, there has been increased criticism of the Act, not least from Suzi Leather, chair of the HFEA. In an interview with the Times newspaper in September 2003, she said that the inadequacies of the Act were becoming 'increasingly obvious'.

In view of these concerns, and the failure of the Government to act on its 2002 recommendations, the Committee plans to consult widely, including by an open 'e-consultation'. Details of this are due to be announced shortly. Discussing the plans for the inquiry, Dr Ian Gibson, chairman of the Committee, said 'the HFE Act was well conceived but has been fraying at the edges for years'.

 

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Science and Technology Committee | 10 July 2002
 
HMSO | 01 November 2002
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

16 August 2005 - by BioNews 
The UK's Department of Health (DH) is inviting views on the way that some assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are regulated in the UK. Its review forms part of a wider consultation on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (HFE) Act, passed in 1990, which some say has become out-of-date, 'outstripped' by...[Read More]
24 March 2005 - by BioNews 
The UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (STC) is deeply divided over its inquiry into Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law. Only half of the ten committee members put their names to the summary report, published today alongside a Special Report detailing the committee's disagreements. The dissenting MPs...[Read More]
14 March 2005 - by BioNews 
The UK's House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (STC) is to recommend that couples should be allowed to use sex selection to achieve the families they desire, and that rules on the creation of 'designer babies' should be eased, according to an article in the Mail on Sunday newspaper...[Read More]
13 December 2004 - by Dr Jess Buxton 
Robert Winston, Britain's best known fertility doctor, stirred up a hornet's nest last week when he called for the abolition of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). His tirade against the UK's regulatory body, launched in an interview for the 'Today' programme on BBC Radio Four, included the accusations...[Read More]
10 December 2004 - by BioNews 
The UK's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) is incompetent, poorly organised, and should be scrapped or replaced with a more flexible body, according to Robert Winston. The fertility doctor and broadcaster made his comments on BBC Radio 4's 'Today' programme, aired on 10 December. In response, HFEA chair...[Read More]

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to Login or Register to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

 


 

- click here to enquire about using this story.


submit to reddit
Delicious delicious
Facebook

Share on Tumblr


Printer Friendly Page


Have your say about BioNews! Complete our 2012 reader survey HERE

Have your say about BioNews! Complete our 2012 reader survey HERE

Have your say about BioNews! Complete our 2012 reader survey HERE


The Progress Educational Trust has been shortlisted for the Charity Times Awards 2011

Good Fundraising Code


Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details