Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews


Printer Friendly Page Follow BioNews on Twitter BioNews RSS feed

 

Login



Futures in Reproduction

News


NICE recommends changes to antenatal screening

22 October 2003

By BioNews

Appeared in BioNews 231

The UK's National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health have published recommendations for the National Health Service in England and Wales on the routine care of healthy pregnant women. The NICE guidance includes advice on how many antenatal appointments each woman should have and what should happen at each one, and on what information should be provided to enable pregnant women to make informed decisions. It also advises what provisions should be made for antenatal screening for a range of conditions, including gestational diabetes, HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) and Down syndrome.

Currently, women with uncomplicated pregnancies have about 14 antenatal appointments, and perhaps visit a hospital for screening, beginning after the 12th week of pregnancy. The new NICE guidelines suggest that these check-ups should begin earlier in the pregnancy, and that the total number of appointments should be reduced to about ten in a first pregnancy and seven in later pregnancies. The recommendations have been made as part of an effort both to standardise antenatal care and to provide women with important information early in their pregnancies. Reducing the number of checks to women with healthy pregnancies would enable more time to be spent with each woman more attention to be given to women with problems or complications.

The guidelines also say that all pregnant women should be offered one of a number of proven, non-invasive methods of screening for Down syndrome, whatever their age, while routine screening for gestational diabetes should be avoided. It also says that women and their partners should receive full information and comprehensive advice about any test they decide to take. Two years ago, the National Screening Committee (NSC) also recommended that by 2004, all pregnant women should be offered non-invasive Down syndrome screening. At that time, according to the NSC, around 80 per cent of pregnant women were already being offered such tests, although there were wide variations in the standards, tests and counselling support available. Dr Peter Brocklehurst, leader of the group behind the new NICE guideline, said that the aim of the recommendation about testing was 'to make sure all women are given information to make informed choices about a range of tests available in pregnancy, including those for Down syndrome'. While he acknowledged that this may increase detection rates and potentially, therefore, terminations of pregnancy, he added 'some women may not want to know, and some may carry a Down's baby and decide to keep it'.

Critics of the recommendations argue that because extra screening could double the number of babies found to have Down syndrome before birth, it would increase the rate of abortion. In addition, the proposed testing in early pregnancy (blood tests and a scan of the fetus' neck) misses four out of ten cases of Down syndrome but also gives 'false positives', where Down syndrome is detected but is not actually present. Such results, warn critics, will increase the rate of miscarriage, as an invasive test such as amniocentesis (which carries a risk of miscarriage) can later be used to provide a diagnosis. Alison Davis, of the pro-life group No Less Human called the NICE recommendations 'fatal discrimination', adding 'the covert message is that if there is anything 'wrong' with the baby, it should be aborted'. But the Down's Syndrome Association has said that it welcomes extended screening procedures, as long as women are given full information about the condition itself, as well as about the tests they are offered.

 

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Antenatal checks on women to be halved
The Daily Telegraph | 22 October 2003
 
Down's test for all births
The Daily Mail | 22 October 2003
 
Pregnancy care shake-up planned
BBC News Online | 22 October 2003
 
Press release: New guideline for the NHS on the care of pregnant women
National Institute for Clinical Excellence | 22 October 2003
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

30 June 2005 - by BioNews 
New recommendations for prenatal screening programmes to detect Down syndrome could lead to some chromosome abnormalities being missed, UK researchers say. A team based at Salisbury District Hospital looked at the likely effect of the proposal to scrap a type of testing called karyotyping in favour of newer, rapid methods...[Read More]
04 March 2004 - by BioNews 
US researchers have developed a new method for testing fetal DNA, which does not involve the use of invasive techniques such as amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS). The scientists, based at the biotech company Ravgen, have found a way to increase the amount of fetal DNA that can be...[Read More]
26 January 2004 - by BioNews 
Accurate prenatal tests for Down syndrome and other chromosome disorders should be made available to all pregnant women, not just those over 35, according to a new US study. Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, evaluated the cost-effectiveness of invasive methods such as amniocentesis, and also surveyed 534...[Read More]

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to Login or Register to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

 


 

- click here to enquire about using this story.

Printer Friendly Page


BioNews Appeal: Please donate HERE to keep BioNews independent and FREE to read


The Progress Educational Trust has been shortlisted for the Charity Times Awards 2011

Good Fundraising Code


Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details