Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews


Print Page Follow BioNews on Twitter BioNews RSS feed

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook







UK High Court grants parental orders in Indian surrogacy case

12 December 2011

By Antony Blackburn-Starza

Appeared in BioNews 637

The UK's High Court has granted parental orders to a couple over two children born through an international surrogacy arrangement, ruling that payments made to the Indian surrogates were not 'disproportionate'.

The children, a boy known as X and a girl known as Y, were born in New Delhi, India, to two different surrogate mothers. Both children were looked after from birth by the intending parents, known as Mr and Mrs A. Mr A is the biological father of both children and the eggs were donated anonymously.

The couple enlisted the services of a company operating from a clinic in a New Delhi hospital to find a surrogate mother, after a British agency said it would not consider couples for another three years due to a shortage of surrogates in the UK.

The surrogacy agreement provided for a payment of 200,000 rupees in 'compensation' to each surrogate, although evidence suggested what was paid in the end was higher at 230,000 rupees (around £3,000). The court heard how one of the surrogates worked as a maid earning 9,000 rupees a month and the other as a housekeeper earning around 11,000 rupees a month.

Mr and Mrs A paid over 2,000,000 rupees to the clinic (around £27,400), which took responsibility for making payments to the surrogates and expenses, both medical and non-medical. The clinic stated the payments to the surrogates represented compensation for loss of earnings over 13 months, although the judge held it 'remains unclear precisely what sums the surrogate mothers actually received and what the monies paid to them actually covered'.

In his reasoning, Sir Nicholas Wall said the critical issue was whether the payments made by Mr and Mrs A fall outside UK law which requires that the court must be satisfied that no money or other benefit – other than for expenses reasonably incurred – was given.

Although the judge said it was likely the payments went beyond 'reasonable expenses', he concluded they were 'not so disproportionate that the granting of parental orders would be an affront to public policy'. He said Mr and Mrs A were acting in 'good faith' and had made no attempt to 'defraud the authorities'.

In deciding whether to retrospectively authorise the payments, Sir Nicholas said it was suggested to the court that the law requires the child's welfare to be the court's 'paramount consideration'. This followed another case in 2010 in which Mr Justice Hedley said that welfare is no longer the court's first consideration but its paramount consideration - although he said the court should still, on the grounds of public policy, scrutinise applications to retrospectively authorise payment.

However, as Mr Justice Hedley pointed out in an earlier case, 'the difficulty is that it is almost impossible to imagine a set of circumstances in which by the time the case comes to court, the welfare of any child (particularly a foreign child) would not be gravely compromised (at the very least) by a refusal to make an order'. Sir Nicholas said he was 'particularly struck' by the passage, which despite a change in the law, he said remained relevant.

The case raises some complex issues. In September, a High Court in Pretoria, South Africa, in outlining guidance for international surrogacy arrangements, expressed concerns that the 'involvement of agencies in the introduction of surrogate mothers can also easily lead to abuse'.

It said with regard to international surrogacy practices, 'it becomes clear particularly in countries such as ours with deep socio-economic disparities and the prevalence of poverty, that the possibility of abuse of underprivileged women is a real and ever present danger'. The judge concluded: 'Ideally the involvement of agencies should be the subject of regulation'.

In another parental order handed down by the UK's High Court in July involving an arrangement with an Indian mother, Mrs Justice Theis sought to emphasise the legal difficulties overseas surrogacy arrangements can create. 'Although the circumstances that have arisen in this case are extremely rare, they bring into sharp focus again, the difficulties that can arise in international surrogacy arrangements', she said.

In the present case, Sir Nicholas noted: 'Mr and Mrs A did not consult solicitors in the UK about the legal implications of an international surrogacy arrangement before flying to India though they were aware of some of the legal difficulties they might encounter'.

 

SOURCES & REFERENCES
BAILII | 06 December 2011
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

03 June 2013 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
A UK High Court judge has said applications for parental orders in international surrogacy cases should be encouraged and made promptly... [Read More]
28 January 2013 - by Nina Chohan 
An Irish couple has brought a legal challenge against the State for refusing to remove the surrogate mother from their children's birth certificates and to register the genetic mother as a legal parent... [Read More]
21 January 2013 - by Nishat Hyder 
The Indian Home Ministry has issued strict visa guidelines making it more difficult for commissioning parents to obtain visas for entry to India for surrogacy arrangements... [Read More]
08 October 2012 - by Ruth Retassie 
A male couple in the UK has been awarded legal parenthood over twins born through an Indian surrogacy arrangement without the consent of the mother.... [Read More]
06 June 2012 - by Natalie Gamble 
Indian surrogacy is a hot media topic, with several stories over the past week about couples being stuck in India waiting for British passports for their biological children. As far as we are concerned, this isn't really news – it is the shared experience of every British parent who has had a child through surrogacy in India, and something we deal with on a daily basis.... [Read More]

14 November 2011 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
A High Court in South Africa has set out guidelines for judicial approaches to surrogacy arrangements in light of new family law legislation which came into force last year.... [Read More]
08 August 2011 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
The UK's High Court has awarded legal parenthood to a deceased father of a child born through a surrogacy arrangement in India.... [Read More]
13 December 2010 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
The UK's High Court has granted legal parenthood to the parents of a child born using a surrogate in the United States to allow them to keep the child in the country.... [Read More]
14 December 2008 - by Ben Jones 
A British couple this week won custody over a pair of twins born to a surrogate mother in the Ukraine. The twin babies were caught in a legal loophole whereby the expectant British couple were unable to bring the twins into the UK, as they were not... [Read More]

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to Login or Register to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

 


 

- click here to enquire about using this story.

Printer Friendly Page

Published by the Progress Educational Trust
Become a Friend of PET HERE, and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation

The Progress Educational Trust was shortlisted for the Charity Times Awards 2011

Good Fundraising Code

Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details