Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook




 

Drastic changes to sperm and egg donation policy made by the HFEA

24 October 2011

By Sandy Starr

Appeared in BioNews 630

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) members approved every recommendation put to them by HFEA staff, concerning how much and what sort of compensation and benefits in kind sperm and egg donors should be permitted to receive for their donation, at a meeting on 19 October. The HFEA has decided that donors should be paid fixed sums, and that these sums should be £35 per clinic visit for sperm donors and £750 per cycle of donation for egg donors.

According to the HFEA, 'these figures are based broadly on comparators within the European Union, a sense of what time and lifestyle alterations donors are required to make and an acknowledgement of the communal and incredibly generous act people perform through the act of donation'. The figure of £35 per clinic visit for sperm donors is derived principally from 'the Danish system', and the figure of £750 per cycle of donation for egg donors is derived principally from 'the Spanish model'.

Furthermore, there will also be provision under the new regime for 'donors who incur excessive expenses to claim additional compensation' beyond the fixed sum. The example of 'excessive expenses' given by the HFEA was 'donors in rural areas', who 'may feasibly incur travel expenses which far exceed donors in urban areas'.

Professor Lisa Jardine, Chair of the HFEA, said: 'My Authority has set a level of compensation which will not deter those interested in donation but will retain donors already in the system, without attracting those who are merely financially motivated.'

Until now, the UK has had a system whereby sperm and egg donors could be compensated for loss of earnings up to a daily maximum of £61.28, but with an overall limit of £250 for each course or cycle of donation. Additionally, sperm and egg donors could receive 'reasonable' documented expenses. However, until now clinics have been specifically prohibited from paying standard fixed sums to donors.

Furthermore, until now compensation could only be given to donors for expenses incurred within the UK. The HFEA has now decided to make donors travelling from overseas eligible to receive the new fixed compensation sums. However, donors travelling from overseas will be ineligible for any additional claims of 'excessive expenses'.

The HFEA permits donors to receive benefits in kind for their donation, and has decided to continue to do so. There is no limit on the monetary value of such benefits in kind, which may include reduced or waived cost of or waiting time for fertility treatment. This means that the monetary value of benefits in kind may exceed substantially both the previous and the new maximum limits on donor compensation.

The HFEA says it will 'take a proactive approach' to donation, and has resolved to set up a new 'national strategy group to improve awareness, donor customer service and retention of donors'. These decisions are the outcome of the HFEA's recent consultation on sperm and egg donation, known as the Donation Review.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority | 19 October 2011
 
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority | 19 October 2011
 
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority | 19 October 2011
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

21 May 2012 - by Alison Bagshawe 
A recent article in the Daily Mail about Altrui's information campaign towards students at Cambridge University typifies popular press reporting at its worst and exemplifies some recurring myths about egg donation...
14 November 2011 - by Dr Sue Avery 
The general public has been well informed about the HFEA's proposed changes in compensation for gamete donors. However, there has been no direct communication with licensed centres and no clear indication of when regulations will change. As a result we are having difficulty dealing with a wave of enthusiasm from potential donors...
07 November 2011 - by George Frodsham 
'Eggsploitation' highlights some worrying issues with the way in which egg-harvesting currently operates. Yet it leaves the viewer with the feeling that they haven't been shown the whole picture and a sneaking suspicion that a hidden agenda is at play...
31 October 2011 - by Andrew Proven Donor 
A shortfall in donated sperm, we are told, has pushed potential recipients onto websites where private sperm donors hawk their reproductive wares. If only the officially sanctioned sperm banks were well stocked, the thinking goes, women would not have to venture into that murky world. But is that correct? What if sperm donation outside the official channels actually carried certain advantages over the clinic system...
24 October 2011 - by Dr Djuke Veldhuis 
Should women who choose their career first, and children second, be allowed to receive IVF on the NHS at an age when some would consider it 'unnatural'? Now ask whether it's acceptable for young soldiers fighting in Afghanistan to store their sperm in case they don't come back. And the questions surrounding reproductive medicine don't end there: after insemination, how much screening or manipulation of genetic material is reasonable?...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust
Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation