Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook



 

TV Review: Horizon - Are You Good or Evil?

19 September 2011

By Suzanne Elvidge

Appeared in BioNews 625

Horizon: Are You Good or Evil?

BBC2, Monday 22 August 2011

'Horizon: Are You Good or Evil?', BBC2, Wednesday 7 September 2011


Good and evil have always been moral perspectives, but this edition of BBC One's science programme Horizon has pulled them firmly into the scientific realm, with an analysis of the science behind good and evil.

'Are you good or evil?' opened with a couple of studies that look at our innate morality – a virtual reality test where people have to decide whether to save a group of five people or an individual from a person with a gun, and a study of the ability of babies to choose a 'good' puppet (around 70 percent chose the puppet that did not run away with the ball). Therefore, it appears that morality is something that we are born with. However, suppressing this moral instinct can be harmful – soldiers who are trained to kill while ignoring this natural sense of morality can become damaged and lose respect for all life, including friends and family. So how is it that some people do not seem to have any sense of revulsion or regret for harm that they do – the psychopaths?

Robert Hare, based at the University of British Columbia, analysed brain PET, positron emission tomography scans (which produce 3D images of the inside of the body, or in this case, the brain) taken to test the responses to emotional words. Comparing those of healthy people and people with schizophrenia or depression, and murderers, he saw a pattern of damage in the orbital cortex and the amygdale, the areas that control impulsivity and emotion. This seems to link with the presence of the so-called 'warrior gene', the shorter allele of the gene expressing the enzyme monoamine oxidase (MAO-A), which has been associated with violence and impulsivity.

In a dramatic section, Professor Jim Fallon, a neuroscientist at University of California Irvine, discovered a family link with the murderer Lizzie Borden and decided to analyse the brains and genomes of his close family. Startlingly, his brain PET scan and genetic profile tied in with the profile of the psychopath. But how had he become a successful researcher and family man, not a charming killer? He puts this down to his happy and contented childhood – it seems that it is not enough just to have the gene and the brain patterns; you also need a history of child abuse. The number of people with psychopathic tendencies in big business (as many as four times the number in the general population) who have successful careers supports this. These individuals are charismatic and succeed at a high level, but are often thrill seekers and are easily bored, and may not work well within teams.

The science of behavioural genomics – described as 'neurolaw' – has been used in the defence of Bradley Waldroup, who murdered his wife's friend and injured his wife. Forensic psychiatrist William Bernet of Vanderbilt University arranged for Waldroup's blood to be tested for the warrior gene, and argued that the combination of the high-risk allele and Waldroup's history of abuse as a child should be taken into account. Waldroup was found guilty of voluntary manslaughter and attempted second-degree murder – he was imprisoned for 32 years but avoided the death penalty.

The programme closed stating that the science is undermining the certainties of our moral code. Our morals are influenced by our genes and our environment, neither of which are of our choosing, so does that mean that we are not free to choose at all? This rather dramatic statement goes against the measured words of Waldroup's forensic psychiatrist, who believes that while the presence of the so-called warrior gene can reduce free will, it does not take it away.

As often happens in popular science programmes, the science is stated as definites rather than as possibilities, and the whole scientific process is tidied up and compressed. However, I think that is inevitable in order to tell the story.

Overall, an excellent episode of Horizon; raising interesting moral, ethical and scientific issues, and one that has left me wondering about a few managers I have worked with in the past. But not me, of course…

SOURCES & REFERENCES

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

28 October 2013 - by Simon Hazelwood-Smith 
At this Royal Institution discussion examining the role that genetics can play in our justice systems, all speakers were in broad agreement with one another...
30 April 2012 - by Luciana Strait 
Children who have been physically abused or bullied are more likely to have shorter telomeres. These structures, found at the ends of chromosomes, act like the plastic caps on shoelaces, and prevent DNA strands from unravelling...
24 October 2011 - by Dr Rebecca Robey 
Living conditions during childhood may have a long-term effect on DNA, according to new research by British and Canadian scientists. The findings, published in the International Journal of Epidemiology, may explain why some people who grow up in socioeconomic deprivation have health disadvantages later in life, despite improvements in their living conditions in adulthood...

11 July 2011 - by Daniel Malynn 
Adam Wishart's documentary charted his personal journey to discover the secrets hidden in his genes. After his mother's death from breast cancer, Adam wanted to discover whether he too is genetically at risk of developing the disease. Looking at his immediate family history, he found seven of his mother's 14 brothers, sister and cousins died from cancer. Adam's mother, aunt and grandmother all had breast cancer...
02 August 2010 - by Dr Aarathi Prasad 
Scientists have found evidence to support a relationship between genetic make-up and emotional response to childhood bullying....
08 March 2010 - by Sandy Starr 
In their concluding remarks, all three speakers said the answer to the question implicit in the event's title - if you are genetically predisposed to a neurodevelopmental disorder, does this effectively mean you are marked for life? - is an emphatic 'no'. Nonetheless, they had divergent views on the likelihood of successfully applying the fruits of genetic research into mental health...
01 October 2006 - by Dr Mairi Levitt 
We're not arguing that genes made him do it but if violent behaviour is genetic then it is probably treatable'. This comment by a US lawyer on behalf of his client (who was eventually executed for murder last year) sums up the hope invested in research into violent and antisocial...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Andy Greenfield

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Henry Malter

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

Sandy Starr


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation