Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook


 


 

A call for Ontario to regulate assisted human reproduction

11 July 2011

By Vince Londini

Appeared in BioNews 615
In December, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) struck down most of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act (AHRA) of 2004. This ruling invalidated almost all Canadian federal regulations covering the many sticky areas of emerging assisted human reproduction (AHR) practice.

If Canadians are to establish rights, justice, and protection for themselves and their children, they must pass laws through provincial governments like Ontario. These must give considered treatment to new technologies and changing social norms. Surrogacy, donor conception and advances in genetic testing all lead Ontarians into uncharted ethical, legal, and moral territory.

Dear to my heart and my children's future are the issues surrounding conception using donor gametes. One of these is donor anonymity. In May, the British Columbia (BC) Supreme Court ruled on the Pratten case (see BioNews 581). This supported the ethics of ensuring donor-conceived people have access to information about their biological origins. BC is leading Canada on this fundamental matter of human rights and Ontario should follow.

Another key area for Ontario is ensuring the future of a Canadian donor registry. This now rests with provincial governments following the demise of key sections of the AHRA. Such a publically-held information store is vitally important to ensure donor-conceived people and gamete donors can discover information about their biological kin.

Ontario should consider how to ensure donor-conceived adults receive counselling. Few clinics - in my experience - provide this. Some even encourage parents to present a false story to their children. Clinics are not required to counsel would-be parents facing a donor conception decision. Nor are they obligated to encourage openness about the issue with their children. Yet many donor-conceived adults warn of psychological damage done when information about their biological origins is withheld.

Ontarians need to build a local, open, altruistic gamete supply too. Currently Canadian legislation dealing with donation is inconsistent. Due to limited supply, the law presently allows gametes to be purchased from international suppliers. Yet the December SCC decision upheld the section of the AHRA that required tissue/gamete donation to be an altruistic act, indicating this reflected core Canadian values.

Birth certificate laws also need amending to recognise the intricate situations resulting from donor conception. Specifically, these laws must ensure the rights of the non-biological parent while protecting the gamete donor from unreasonable liability.

It also falls to the Ontario provincial government to protect consumers of AHR services. Recent scandals, including the Barwin case of an alleged sperm mix-up in Ottawa, suggest that industry-led certification and enforcement may prove insufficient.

So how must Ontario proceed? The answer is to pass clear legislation that defines and enforces ethical AHR practice, especially surrounding donor conception. This legislation will assert the rights of Ontarians who pursue sanctioned AHR treatments, guard the rights of the children created, and ensure the well-being of all parties.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
CBC News | 13 September 2010
 

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

20 February 2012 - by Julianna Photopoulos 
Lawyers representing British Columbia's government were at the Canadian province's Court of Appeal last Tuesday attempting to overturn an earlier ruling which would effectively end anonymous gamete donation...

06 June 2011 - by Professor Eric Blyth and Dr Marilyn Crawshaw 
The regulation of assisted human reproduction in Canada has had a long and tortuous history. Twenty one years after a Royal Commission appointed by the federal government recommended legislation (1), and following several failed attempts to get legislation through the Canadian parliament, the Assisted Human Reproduction Act 2004 came into force (2)...
23 May 2011 - by Sarah Pritchard 
Anonymous egg and sperm donation will no longer be permitted in British Columbia (BC), Canada, after a donor-conceived woman, Olivia Pratten, took the provincial government to court to argue that its adoption laws discriminated against individuals such as herself....
25 October 2010 - by Antony Blackburn-Starza 
A Canadian woman conceived through donor insemination has been allowed to bring legal action against the province of British Columbia to obtain information about her biological heritage, which may include the identity of the sperm donor involved....
10 November 2008 - by Sarah Pritchard 
A 26 year old woman in Canada conceived using donor sperm has begun legal action to attempt to make available the identities of anonymous sperm donors, including that of her own father. Olivia Pratten is acting on behalf of all those in British Columbia (BC) conceived using...

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to or  to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions


- click here to enquire about using this story.

Published by the Progress Educational Trust

CROSSING FRONTIERS

Public Conference
London
8 December 2017

Speakers include

Professor Azim Surani

Professor Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz

Professor Robin Lovell-Badge

Sally Cheshire

Professor Guido Pennings

Katherine Littler

Professor Allan Pacey

Dr Sue Avery

Professor Richard Anderson

Dr Elizabeth Garner

Dr Andy Greenfield

Dr Anna Smajdor

Dr Henry Malter

Vivienne Parry

Dr Helen O'Neill

Dr César Palacios-González

Philippa Taylor

Fiona Fox

Sarah Norcross

Sandy Starr


BOOK HERE

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation