Subscribe to the BioNews newsletter for free

Login
Advanced Search

Search for
BioNews


Print Page Follow BioNews on Twitter BioNews RSS feed

Like the Progress Educational Trust on Facebook



King's College London - Health: More than a medical matter






Concerns about the consultation on the future of the HFEA

16 July 2012

By Rachel Cutting

Chair of the Association of Clinical Embryologists

Appeared in BioNews 665
After over twenty years as an instrumental part of the fertility treatment sector, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) is under threat as the Government pushes ahead with plans to reduce the number of arm's-length bodies. The move is part of a wider initiative to cut NHS administrative costs by more than a third by 2015.

The first step of the review process, which was proposed by Lord Howe, is a formal public consultation (reported in BioNews 663). The consultation aims to seek views on whether:

  • all functions should transfer to the Care Quality Commission (CQC) (apart from research which would pass to the Health Research Authority) and the HFEA would be abolished, or;

  • all functions should transfer as above but a limited number of functions would transfer to organisations other than the CQC, or;

  • the HFEA should retain its functions and deliver further savings.

The Government's preferred option is the first. But here at the Association of Clinical Embryologists (ACE) - the professional body representing clinical embryologists in the UK and abroad – we have grave concerns about dissolving the HFEA. As such, we are joining other organisations such as the British Medical Association, the British Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing to ensure our views are heard by completing the consultation.

Since Louise Brown, the first IVF baby, was born in 1978, we have not only seen unprecedented advances in the technology used in fertility treatment, leading to ever improving outcomes, but public acceptance of fertility treatment has also grown. The HFEA has played a pivotal role here through both its regulatory and public-facing presence, supporting hundreds of thousands of people in the UK through their fertility journeys.

Over the last 20 years, the HFEA has developed robust regulatory mechanisms. These well-defined processes and safeguards have enabled practitioners in the UK to pursue areas of research and practice that have been much harder to engage elsewhere.

What's more, the expertise the HFEA has accrued means it is uniquely equipped to deal with highly sensitive and emotive issues that can arise during fertility treatment. Indeed, it has debated and ruled on a number of high profile, highly sensitive issues such as sex selection, payments to sperm and egg donors, and 'saviour siblings' (where an embryo is selected to be a tissue match for a sick sibling).

While we acknowledge that the CQC already registers a wide range of NHS and independent health care providers, ACE is not convinced that the CQC is well placed to fulfill the current role of the HFEA. The HFEA's specific function is to ensure that the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act is enforced and that fertility centres work within this complex legislation. To move the core functions of the HFEA into the CQC may result in a loss of the expertise and experience which the HFEA has worked long and hard to establish.

This move could also expose patients and clinics to an increased risk of error or incident during an inevitable and potentially lengthy period of transition. An example of this is data collection - the CQC does not routinely collect large volumes of data on a scale that is currently submitted by fertility centres. It is essential that accurate data is held, especially with respect to donor-conceived children.

Beyond the questionable effect dissolving the HFEA would have on efficiency within the sector, there is also the impact that losing the HFEA could have on patients. It is trusted as the industry body that regulates treatment and helps patients put their hope and trust in the fertility centre they choose for their treatment. And ultimately, patient safety must be paramount.

To lose the expertise of the HFEA and the level of public confidence it has established, will not help fertility centres continue to develop and offer their patients the best possible standards of care. In fact, it is likely undermine the good work done to date and deny patients the support they need when they need it most.

But that is not to say that the process could not be improved. ACE of course supports reviewing and improving the regulatory process to make NHS systems more efficient. And in truth, most of us working in the sector would welcome a more efficient approach to inspection and licensing.

As such, it is essential that alongside this consultation, work is done to review how the process could be improved. Work led by the professional bodies is underway to suggest how the regulatory process should be bettered and the stronger relationships between the sector and the regulator will hopefully lead to a positive future.

An alternative proposal could be to align the CQC and HFEA, maintaining the HFEA brand and expertise rather than dissolving it altogether. Both inspection processes could be amalgamated into one, reducing the inspection burden both to clinics and inspectors. This would fulfill the Government's three aims: strengthen the effectiveness of regulation in this area; clarify the regulatory landscape for service providers; and reduce the complexity of the regulatory landscape.

The consultation period ends on 28 September and the final decision is due to be made later this year. ACE would encourage as many people as possible to contribute to this important review process.

 

SOURCES & REFERENCES

RELATED ARTICLES FROM THE BIONEWS ARCHIVE

28 January 2013 - by Baroness Ruth Deech 
In January the Department of Health published its response to the consultation on proposals to transfer the functions of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority and the Human Tissue Authority to the Care Quality Commission and the new Health Research Authority... [Read More]
17 September 2012 - by Peter Thompson 
It's a busy week for the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). As we launch our government-commissioned public consultation on mitochondria replacement, we are in the midst of a public debate about who should regulate IVF and embryo research. We will publish our response to the Government's consultation on the HFEA's future later this week. This comment piece gives a taste of what we will be saying.... [Read More]
03 September 2012 - by Henny Braund 
The political debate around the Government's Arm's-Length Body Review has centred on whether any change will deliver greater accountability, financial efficiencies or cuts to services. For Anthony Nolan, a charity that helps provide stem cells for patients who need life-saving transplants, the review is more nuanced... [Read More]
23 July 2012 - by Walter Merricks 
To many people concerned with donor conception - patients, parents, donors and donor-conceived people - the Government plans to abolish the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) sound extremely worrying... [Read More]

09 July 2012 - by Professor Alison Murdoch 
Government intends to save money by improving the efficiency of regulatory bodies. Providers of fertility treatments also favour more efficient regulation as it would help them improve their own services. This common purpose - the need for improved efficiency - is reflected in the consultation announced by the government; the central question is how it should be achieved... [Read More]
02 July 2012 - by Ayesha Ahmad 
The UK Government has launched a consultation on the future of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) and Human Tissue Authority (HTA) amid proposals to transfer the regulators' functions elsewhere.... [Read More]
02 July 2012 - by Earl Howe 
Standards should never come into question, but it's clear to this Government that NHS administrative costs can be streamlined. That is why I set out proposals to change responsibility for regulating fertility treatment and human tissue last week... [Read More]
02 April 2012 - by Tamara Hirsch 
A recent report claims England's regulator of health and social care, the Care Quality Commission (CQC), is not at present ready to take on the functions of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA)... [Read More]
20 February 2012 - by Victoria Kay 
The UK's fertility watchdog, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), has amassed cash reserves of around £3.4 million from charges to the clinics it licenses, prompting calls for the money to be given back to those seeking IVF treatment.... [Read More]

HAVE YOUR SAY
Be the first to have your say.

You need to Login or Register to add comments.

By posting a comment you agree to abide by the BioNews terms and conditions

 


 

- click here to enquire about using this story.

Printer Friendly Page

Published by the Progress Educational Trust
RISK ASSESSMENT:
BREAST CANCER, PREDICTION AND SCREENING
FREE public event in central London, 6.30pm on Thursday 8 May 2014 - find out more HERE

DataLabel Supplying Printed Labels To The UK For Over 15 Years

ANNIVERSARY APPEAL
Please donate HERE, so that the Progress Educational Trust can continue throughout 2014 (and beyond) while keeping BioNews FREE for you to read

The Progress Educational Trust was shortlisted for the Charity Times Awards 2011

Advertise your products and services HERE - click for further details

Good Fundraising Code

Become a Friend of PET HERE, and give the Progress Educational Trust a regular donation